edgerop，anchor bolt

"Biggest, Boldest Step"Immediately after the address, Adhia sent a tweet: "This is the biggest and the boldest step by the Government for containing black money.Other critics say the Adhia team fell prey to a form of "group think" that ignored outside advice.They also say the plan was flawed because of a failure to ramp up printing of new notes ahead of time.At a stroke, Modi scrapped money worth 15.Secrecy paramountSecrecy was paramount, but clues had been left.".Previously unreported details of Modis handling of the so-called "demonetisation" open a window onto the hands-on role he played in implementing a key policy, and how he was willing to act quickly even when the risks were high. Back in April, analysts at State Bank of India said that demonetisation of large-denomination notes was possible.Modi, in his TV address to the nation, cautioned that people could face temporary hardship as replacement 500 and 2,000 rupee notes were introduced. "One is never ready for this kind of disruption - but it is a constructive disruption," said Narendra Jadhav, a 31-year former chief economist of Reserve Bank of India who now represents BJP in Rajya Sabha.

Yet in office, he struggled to keep his promise.Over more than a year, Modi commissioned research from officials at the finance ministry, RBI and think-tanks on how to advance his fight against black money, a close aide said. They were supported by a young team of researchers working in two rooms at Modis New Delhi residence, as he plotted his boldest reform since coming to power in 2014.The Reserve Bank of India also disclosed in May that it was making preparations for a new series of banknotes that were confirmed in August when it announced it had approved a design for a new 2,000 rupee note. In reality, he had a direct line to Modi and they would speak in their native Gujarati when they met to discuss issues in depth."Under Adhias oversight, the team of researchers assembled and modelled the findings in what was, for it, a theoretical exercise. It was made up of young experts in data and financial analysis; some ran Modis social media accounts and a smartphone app that he used to solicit public feedback.Filling ATMs with the 8 trillion rupees in new banknotes that the finance ministry reckons are needed to restore liquidity to the economy is even trickier.

Labourers have also been unpaid and produce has rotted in markets as cash stopped changing hands.New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi handpicked a trusted bureaucrat, little known outside financial circles, to spearhead a radical move to abolish 86 percent of the countrys cash overnight and take aim at the huge shadow economy.Modi has staked his reputation and popularity on the move. Not enough replacement notes were printed in preparation for the upheaval, and it could take months for things to return to normal.In the words of one former top official who has worked at the finance ministry and RBI: "They dont know whats happening in the real world. Calling for an act of collective sacrifice, he promised steps to soften the blow for the nine in 10 Indians who live in the cash economy.4 trillion rupees, equal to 86 percent of cash in Asias third-largest economy.In a best-case scenario, in which Indias four banknote presses churned out new 500 and 2,000 rupee notes designed to replace the abolished ones, it would take at least three months to hit that target. Indias 200,000 cash dispensers could not handle the new, smaller, notes and it would take weeks to reconfigure them.

"The boast harked back to Modis election vow to recover black money from abroad that had resonated with voters fed up with the corruption scandals that plagued the last Congress government.The secrecy was aimed at outflanking those who might profit from prior knowledge, by pouring cash into gold, property and other assets and hide illicit wealth.Direct line to ModiOverseeing the campaign, with support from the backroom team camped out at Modis sprawling bungalow in the capital, was Adhia, a top finance ministry official. "The plan was to introduce it around Nov.With Uttar Pradesh holding an election in early 2017 that could decide Modis chances of a second term in office, there is little time for the hoped-for benefits of his cash swap to outweigh short-term pain.Some officials in the finance ministry had expressed doubts about scrapping high-value notes when the idea came up China screws for discussion. "I have done all the research and, if it fails, then I am to blame," Modi told a cabinet meeting on November 8 shortly before the move was announced, according to three ministers who attended.The announcement caused chaos, with huge queues forming at banks when they reopened after a short holiday.He demanded answers to questions such as: How quickly India could print new banknotes; how to distribute them; would state banks benefit if they received a rush of new deposits; and who would gain from demonetisation?

The topics were broken up to prevent anyone from joining the dots and concluding that a cash swap was in the offing.The idea is backed by some economists, although the speed of its implementation is widely seen as radical.The printing presses had only just started turning when the media finally started to run with the story in late October."We didnt want to let the cat out of the bag," said a senior official directly involved.Adhia was named revenue secretary in September 2015, reporting formally to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.In the worlds largest democracy the demonetisation was revolutionary: it called into question the states promise to "pay the bearer" the face value on every banknote.The 58-year-old served as principal secretary to Modi from 2003-06 when he was chief minister of Gujarat, establishing a relationship of trust with his boss and introducing him to yoga. They now feel resentment at the secrecy in which Adhia rammed through the plan on Modis orders.New 2,000 rupee notes were hard to come by and barely any new 500 rupee notes had been printed. 18, but there was a clear sign that it could get leaked," said one person with direct knowledge.

 Yet for all the planning, Modi and Adhia knew they could not foresee every eventuality, and were willing to move swiftly.When announced, the abolition of high-value banknotes of 500 and 1,000 rupees came as a bolt from the blue.Hasmukh Adhia, the bureaucrat, and five others privy to the plan were sworn to utmost secrecy, say sources with knowledge of the matter.Colleagues interviewed by Reuters said he had a reputation for integrity and discretion.While some advocates say the scrapping of the banknotes will bring more money into the banking system and raise tax revenues, millions of Indians are furious at having to queue for hours outside banks to exchange or deposit their old money. "Had people got a whiff of the decision, the whole exercise would have been meaningless

Tell me, how often do you see a television anchor not cracking jokes on somebody’s skin colour? How many times do you see a politician validating their so-called tolerance for dark-skinned people? These custodians of Indian culture are at fault!” he concludes. A photo captured during the India-South Africa match at the ICC Champions has been making the rounds on Twitter, and not for the right reasons. China screws factory And, people believe that they can comment on anything and everything,” he explains. As if your entire life were a film,” he says.Innate racism and casual body shaming spreads across genders. After a point, I am like, ‘Guys, enough, let’s move past this’, but no, they don’t. So, this obsession with looking good goes across genders,” he says.

While women always have faced discrimination based on skin tone and looks, it seems men are not exempt from body-shaming either.”Sorabh Pant of East India Comedy thinks it is a simple case of privilege. Men are body shamed very casually,” he says.This kind of stereotyping isn’t a new thing. Equal rights activist Harrish Iyer believes that the fact that such a meme went viral on Twitter is perfect proof of how men are victims of their own patriarchy and ***ism. “So, when it comes to something like body shaming, the same rules that apply to women also apply to men.”He, however, urges people to look at the bright side. As someone from the advertising industry that is obsessed with fairness creams and other products to make people look their brightest, ad director Vinil Matthew says the desperation to look their best is swallowing people across genders. “My Facebook mentions are filled with people mocking me with bald jokes and gaps between my teeth. “When so many people were mocking the guy in the meme, I am sure many people stood up against this kind of humour.

That is just how social media works — the good and the bad. You want to post your photos on Facebook and Instagram and get the maximum number of likes. He also believes that people will latch onto anything as long as they can peer into someone else’s life. “Comedians and these meme makers are just making jokes. This is not just true for women, but equally valid for men. He thinks it boils down to society propelling damaging stereotypes. The comedian also points out how he faces casual body shaming on a regular basis.”—With inputs from Dyuti Basu.”While jokes like these are omnipresent on the Internet with a fresh stock of casual ***ist, racist humour filling up every day, comedian Kunal Kamra doesn’t believe comedians or people who make these jokes are to be blamed. Elaborating on his points, Harrish says, “The men’s fairness cream ad starring Shah Rukh Khan shows a model applying a women’s fairness cream while dancing to Pari Hoon Mein. A picture of a white woman and an Indian man sitting alongside each other at the match has gone viral with n number of jokes.

A picture of a white woman and an Indian man sitting alongside each other at the match has gone viral with n number of jokes. When people feel like they can peer into someone’s life, they do, and they most certainly will say anything at all. Again, this can be thought of as an instance of casual ***ism against men. The real problem is with people who overlook these. The photo captured in a moment of fun has now become a subject of ridicule with people pointing out that the guy could never get a lovely, foreigner girl like that — mainly referring to his looks and the fact that he is dark skinned. “Today, everyone has a voice with the Internet and social media. “With memes, it feels like anyone can capture you at any moment without your knowledge and make fun of you. We need to concentrate on the right side.Screenwriter and novelist Anuvab Pal finds this phenomenon fascinating. “I don’t think individuals who make such jokes think about crossing a certain line or misbehaving. “We are becoming increasingly vain as a society, and particularly with the advent of the social media, there’s a tendency to try and look the best you can. It seems like inherent racism, casual body shaming too applies across genders

China wholesale screws The news of her first appearance on local channel Kohenoor TV on Saturday went viral on social media and was just days after she became the first transgender model on the catwalk at the annual Pakistan Fashion Design Council fashion show. My story is no different from that of a hijra on the street you see begging.The news of her first appearance on local channel Kohenoor TV on Saturday went viral on social media and was just days after she became the first transgender model on the catwalk at the annual Pakistan Fashion Design Council fashion show..Her catapult into the spotlight came after transgender activist Zara Changezi was named as star of a love film, the Senate passed a bill to protect transgender people, and a Pakistani province agreed to an X gender on driving licences.

"I got a lot of appreciation from those associated with the fashion industry when I did catwalk modelling two weeks back, and now this .The Supreme Court ruled in 2009 hijras could get national identity cards as a "third ***" and last year the government issued its first passport with a transgender category.The transgender community was counted in the national census for the first time last year, recording 10,418 in a population of about 207 million although many said this was too low.Meanwhile the government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - one of Pakistans four provinces where there was a spate of attacks on transgender people in 2016 - issued driving licences to transgender people marked with an X in gender.However campaigners said there were signs of progress in the conservative South Asian nation where homo***uality is a crime.Malik, 21, said she had lost count of the positive telephone calls and mesغير مجاز مي باشدes she had received for her new role which was a major contrast to previous years when she battled to survive."."We are left with no option but to turn to begging, dancing and selling our bodies.

"(People) assume being trans means one has a certain orientation, and harness hate against homo***uals, which then shows in their transphobic behaviour," Yasir said."Getting a driving permit will not only be a proof of identity but open another livelihood avenue, for instance, finding employment in cab companies," said Qamar Naseem of Peshawar-based Blue Veins that lobbies for transgender people.Sana Yasir, an inter*** educator and physician, said Pakistan was becoming more tolerant of transgender people but acceptance was not yet widespread with many people confusing gender identity with ***ual orientation.."I was thrown out after (10th grade) after which I joined a beauty salon, earned just about enough to put myself through college, but it was not easy.While Malik is happy that the government is slowly bringing the community into the mainstream, she said the only way to get meaningful change if is "change begins at home". (Photo: ANI) Karachi: As the first transgender news anchor in Pakistan, Marvia Malik is proud to be at the forefront of changing attitudes in her country but she says there is a long way to go.

Charity Trans Action Pakistan estimates there are at least half a million transgender people in the country.For although transgender people technically enjoy better rights in Pakistan than in many other nations, in practice they are marginalized and face discrimination in education and jobs."We have to tell parents not to be ashamed of their kids who cannot conform to the *** assigned at birth," she said, adding that transgender people were often thrown out by their families."Many "hijras" - which includes transvestites, trans***uals and eunuchs - in Pakistan, as well as other South Asian nations such as India and Bangladesh, are attacked, murdered, raped or forced to work as *** workers, dancers, or beggars. its quite overwhelming," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.X marks transgenderEarlier this month the Senate unanimously approved a bill to protect the rights of transgender people which, once passed by both houses, means transgender people will no longer have to appear before a medical board to confirm their gender.Malik, 21, said she had lost count of the positive calls/mesغير مجاز مي باشدes she received for her new role which was a major contrast to previous yrs

Under the current laws, anyone born in the US irrespective of the nationality of parents, automatically becomes an American citizen. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, said it would require a constitutional amendment to make necessary changes on who all can acquire citizenship. I know the Congress has looked at legislative action to reconsider that," Pence said in an interview. Number two, you can definitely do it with an act of Congress. "It would also likely deter the practice of foreigners having anchor babies, where they aim to give birth to children on US soil so as to obtain US citizenship for their children at birth," Breitbart said.

Itll happen with an executive order.Read: Trump may end birthright citizenship for US-born babies of immigrantsThe full interview "Axios on HBO" is scheduled to be aired on Sunday."It would mean the children of illegal aliens, even if born in the United States, would not be bestowed US citizenship China wholesale nylon nail-in anchors upon birth," it said.. Number one. Revoking birthright citizenship would have immediate and far-reaching consequences, it said. The only way to eliminate birthright citizenship would be through a new Constitutional amendment," he said.""You cannot end the birthright citizenship with an executive order," said Congressman Paul Ryan, Speaker of the US House of Representatives. "We didnt like it when (former President) Obama tried changing immigration laws via executive action, and obviously as conservatives, we believe in the Constitution," Ryan told a local radio station in Lexington, Kentucky.

"We are in the process.' (Photo: File) Washington: President Donald Trumps decision to bring an executive order to end the right to the US citizenship for children born in the US to non-citizens has invited widespread criticism, even from his own party. A portion of the interview was released Tuesday.Vice President Mike Pence also came out in Trumps defence, saying, "The President has made clear is that we are looking at action that would reconsider birthright citizenship. We all cherish the language of the 14th Amendment."No president can change the Constitution with the stroke of a pen.He said that we are the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the US for 85 years with all of those benefits.""We all know what the 14th Amendment says. You dont have to do it."I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me it would take a constitutional amendment to change that as opposed to an executive order," Grassley told a local news channel in Iowa.The 14th Amendment to the Constitution affirms that, with very few exceptions, all persons born in the US are American citizens, regardless of the immigration status of their parents, said the American Immigration Council. Thats what youre talking about.Such a practice to give citizenship to anyone born in the US is 'ridiculous', Trump said.

Senator Lindsay Graham said that he intends to introduce a legislation in the Senate to bring a constitutional amendment in this regard. I think the President is looking at executive action. Its ridiculous. Breitbart News, however, came out in support of Trumps move. Eliminating birthright citizenship would do nothing to solve our immigration issues," said Beth Werlin, executive director of the American Immigration Council. Such a practice to give citizenship to anyone born in the US is "ridiculous", Trump said.In his latest hardline immigration rhetoric ahead of the midterm congressional elections, Trump, in an interview with Axios, has said birthright citizenship "has to end" and that it would "with an executive order."Birthright citizenship defines who we are as a nation and is a core part of our American heritage and history."Its ridiculous.Another Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi slammed Trump for his move."It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment, one amendment.

But now they are saying, I can do it just with an executive order," Trump told Axios in an interview." According to Axios, Trump said that he has run the idea of ending birthright citizenship by his counsel and plans to proceed with the highly-controversial move, which certainly will face legal challenges. The Supreme Court has upheld the principle of birthright citizenship for more than a century, it said."The President does not have the power to erase parts of the Constitution, but he and the GOP Congress have spent two years trying to erase protections for people with pre-existing conditions," Pelosi said. "President Trumps new claim he can unilaterally end the Constitutions guarantee of citizenship shows Republicans spiraling desperation to distract from their assault on Medicare, Medicaid and people with pre-existing conditions," she said.

But the Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled on whether or not the language of the 14th Amendment, subject to the jurisdiction thereof, applies specifically to people who are in the country illegally. Trump, in an interview with Axios, has said birthright citizenship 'has to end' and that it would 'with an executive order. And it has to end". Trump said that the effort to end this practice was in the process

This does not mean automatic entry for Dhoni. But for the fact that Sri Lanka have played so poorly in the past few weeks, this would go down wholesale drop-in anchors as among the more sensational ODI results in recent times. This was a maestro with no hang-ups. The history of World Cup cricket throws up interesting examples of players who, in the sunset of their careers, were of critical importance to their teams’s fortunes.S.I am almost stretching this piece into an advocacy for Dhoni because I sense growing impatience about his value to the team. Almost every match yet had been so one-sided as to be predictable, even boring. Experience and maturity are not easily substituted and India must not ignore this aspect as they narrow down on choices for the 2019 World Cup. There can’t be free pasغير مجاز مي باشدe for anybody.In 1991-92, Pakistan owed their success as much to 39-year-old Imran Khan and 35-year-old Javed Miandad as exciting young talent like Wasim Akram and Inzamam-ul-Haq.

To play the way he did demands clarity of thought, fortitude apart from fine understanding of match situations.Subsequent tournaments too highlight how richness of experience can make a huge difference.But in the context of that match — and India’s gameplan going ahead for the 2019 World Cup — Dhoni’s was perhaps the more significant contribution.Dhoni may not make as many runs as he used to, and occasionally not as swiftly as he used to, but his relevance as the 2019 World Cup approaches does not lessen. Meanwhile, his selection must be assessed in the context of a tweaked job profile, not the old yardstick. That he did highlights just how deep India bat currently. He read the situation perfectly, dropped anchor, eschewed aggression, and allowed Bhuvaneshwar to take over as main run getter.I can stretch this further to the influential roles played by Steve Waugh in 1999, Adam Gilchrist in 2007 and Sachin Tendulkar in 2011 (all in their mid or late 30s) in the victories registered by their respective teams. He showed steel of nerves and not a little skill with the bat.But that is laboring the point. Bhuvneshwar Kumar and M.

For instance, in the inaugural World Cup final in 1975, while everybody remembers Clive Lloyd’s blistering 102 it is unlikely the West Indies would have won without 38-year-old Rohan Kanhai’s half century and crucial partnership with his captain after a top order collapse.The onus is still on Dhoni to maintain his fitness and form. Dhoni.Most impressive, of course, was Bhuvaneshwar’s half-century.. For a number 9, he could hardly have been faulted had he not measured up. In the 1983 World Cup, while Kapil Dev’s 175 against Zimbabwe was the turning point for India, this would have been impossible without 35-year-old Syed ******mani’s 26 out of a 126-runs partnership.Chief coach Ravi Shastri in a tweet likened India’s win to a `jail break’.Most impressive, of course, was Bhuvaneshwar’s half-century. Playing second fiddle to a junior, more so when you are under attack from critics is not easy. This largely stems from his past record, and more particularly his batting.

He showed steel of nerves and not a little skill with the bat. To see a keenly contested match then was a dramatic and welcome departure.From a near impossible situation, these two put on a sterling century partnership that took India to victory. In my reckoning, this assessment could be flawed. If somewhat euphemistic, this nonetheless captured best the stunning turnaround in the match by Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Bhuvaneshwar Kumar after eight wickets had fallen for not too many. But the importance of such an approach increases when seen in the present context.Of course, these are hardly new qualities in Dhoni. In 1996, arguably the biggest contributor in Sri Lanka’s triumph was their oldest hand Arjuna Ranatunga. Most pertinently, it shows strength of character, demanding sublimation of ego. (Photo: PTI) India’s fantastic win last week in the second ODI has been the highlight of an otherwise puerile tour of Sri Lanka